tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post6161930069073602370..comments2024-03-29T01:42:29.824+03:00Comments on Heralding the Rise of Russia: Murderous Jews & the Bolshevik Revolution - July, 2010Arevordihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09926782646398360125noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-33284703247448091662019-01-12T05:43:30.081+03:002019-01-12T05:43:30.081+03:00В 1940 г. Ханс-Юрген Кёлер в книге «В недрах геста...В 1940 г. Ханс-Юрген Кёлер в книге «В недрах гестапо» (Hans-Jurgen Koehler, «Inside The Gestapo») пишет следующее о бабушке Гитлера Марии Анне Шикльгрубер: «Девушка приехала в Вену работать служанкой и стала прислугой в особняке Ротшильдов,и неизвестного дедушку Гитлера следует, скорее всего, искать в этом шикарном особняке».Эта информация подтверждается Вальтером Лангером (Walter Langer, «The Mind Of Hitler»), который утверждает: «Отец Адольфа, Алоис Гитлер был незаконным сыном Анны Марии Шикльгрубер… Анна Мария Шикльгрубер жила в Вене в то время, когда она забеременела.Тогда она работала служанкой в доме барона Ротшильда.Как только факт её беременности стал известным хозяевам, её отправили обратно домой, где родился Алоис».Раковский утверждает, что когда в 1929 г. национал-социалистическая партия переживала кризис роста и у неё не хватало финансовых ресурсов, «они» послали туда своего посла.Раковский называет его имя - один из Варбургов.В прямых переговорах с Гитлером договорились о финансировании национал-социалистической партии, и Гитлер за два года получил миллионы долларов, пересланных ему с Уолл-Стрита, и миллионы марок от немецких финансистов через Яльмара Шахта.Содержание СА и СС, а также финансирование происходивших выборов, давших Гитлеру власть в руки, делается на доллары и марки, присланные «Ими».Парадокс заключался в том, что они боролись за коммунизм в форме глобального государства…<br />По убеждению Раковского, «Сталин не способен был воплотить в жизнь ни одной марксистской теории».Сталин только назывался коммунистом, но не был таковым по идеологии и по делам.Объективно он занимал имперские позиции, и потому он был сопоставим для них с царём.Гитлер же боролся «с самодержавным царём «Кобой I», и поэтому объективно Гитлер был революционером-коммунистом, которого они и привели к власти для борьбы против СССР-России.После войны, в 1948 г. президент США Гари Трумэн под давлением Ротшильдов признаёт государство Израиль.За это они выделили ему на избирательную компанию $2 млн. Они заявили, что Израиль является первым еврейским государством в Палестине, а в течение получаса после этого президент Трумэн объявил, что США – это первое иностранное государство, которое это признаёт.Был представлен флаг Израиля.Эмблемой на флаге стал символ Ротшильдов - шестиконечная звезда («звезда Давида»).Этот символ привел в негодование многих евреев, которые полагали, что символом должен был стать древнейший еврейский символ Менора.Утверждалось также, что так называемая «звезда Давида» не является даже еврейским символом.Sargis Muradyannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-58176121043466445122019-01-12T05:42:57.223+03:002019-01-12T05:42:57.223+03:00По этому я прошу вас быть максимально трезвым когд...По этому я прошу вас быть максимально трезвым когда Враги Армян и Русских пытаются этот исторический период искажённом форме приписать Братскоу Русскому Народу!!!!<br />Хочу добавить что Блогадаря Товарища Сталина и Товарища Держинског эти сатанисты заговорщики прикрывающими под именем коммунистическим революционерами, были разоблачениы 1921- 24 годах и мы все тогда были спасение от сатанинской рабства!<br />Борьба отчистки страны от сатанинских заговорщиков продолжалось до 1938 года! Года Большой чистки!!!<br />И блогодаря этой Большой чистки наши Деды смогли выстоять втарую попытку рабства, Втарую Мировую!<br />Настоящее время идёт третая попытка нас порабатит!<br />Одним и тем же "семьёй" одними и тем же сатанистамы!!!<br /><br />Кристиан Раковский (Хаим Рейковер), бывший кровавый диктатор «Советской Украины», личный друг Троцкого, один из основателей коммунистического интернационала, член ложи иллюминатов и бывший советский посол в Париже, на допросе в 1938 г. сделал шокирующие заявления относительно «русской революции» ипланов Ротшильдов.Материалы допроса Раковского были впоследствии опубликованы в книге «Красная симфония».Он подтвердил, что иллюминаты-Ротшильды планировали использовать коммунизм для установления мировой диктатуры сверхбогачей.Раковский свидетельствует, что те же самые силы, которые возвысили и привели к власти Троцкого, дали и «Гитлеру возможность торжества».«Они, в конце концов, увидели, что Сталин не может быть низвергнут путём государственного переворота, и их исторический опыт продиктовал им решение «bis» (повторение): проделать со Сталиным то, что было сделано с царем, - отмечает Раковский.– Но имелось тут одно затруднение, казавшееся нам непреодолимым.Во всей Европе не было государства-агрессора.Ни одно из них не было расположено удобно в географическом отношении и не обладало армией, достаточной для того, чтобы атаковать Россию.Если такой страны не было, то «они» должны были создать её.Только одна Германия располагала соответствующим населением и позициями, удобными для нападения на СССР, и была способна нанести Сталину поражение;вы можете понять, что Веймарская республика не была задумана как агрессор ни с политической, ни с экономической стороны;наоборот, она была удобна для вторжения.На горизонте голодной Германии заблистала скоротечная звезда Гитлера.Пара проницательных глаз остановила на ней своё внимание.Мир явился свидетелем его молниеносного возвышения».Sargis Muradyannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-6612014476697506432017-01-13T08:10:54.384+03:002017-01-13T08:10:54.384+03:00 The same who were the KILLERS in Russia are the s... The same who were the KILLERS in Russia are the same that were the murderers in Germany of SUPPOSEDLY JEWS ! The same start wars to make money. The same create the language for who is a bigot, antisemitic, homophobic and so on. I fell for all the lies my whole life too! The same masquerade as Jesuits! But are anything but Christian. For anyone who does not know whats going on watch this. This will spell it all out . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oeb9E7qW-jIAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-18390364214615921522016-12-02T14:25:16.702+03:002016-12-02T14:25:16.702+03:00I can see you have awesome stuff here. There are m...I can see you have awesome stuff here. There are many to say about the Russian RevolutionRussian revolutionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMKOf_GSGqUnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-54641057759259555752016-07-01T11:31:19.674+03:002016-07-01T11:31:19.674+03:00People are finally starting to wake.
Greetings fr...People are finally starting to wake.<br /><br />Greetings from Norway:)B. Holsthttp://norskeroster.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-23648884311473903322016-03-26T05:34:20.449+03:002016-03-26T05:34:20.449+03:00And the jews stranglhold on them is as strong as e...And the jews stranglhold on them is as strong as ever0jrnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-44443099769556152842016-01-26T23:38:21.373+03:002016-01-26T23:38:21.373+03:00"One of the greatest myths of contemporary hi..."One of the greatest myths of contemporary history is that the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was a popular uprising of the downtrodden masses against the hated ruling class of the Tsars. As we shall see, however, the planning, the leadership and especially the financing came entirely from outside Russia, mostly from financiers in Germany, Britain and the United States. Furthermore we shall see, that the Rothschild Formula played a major role in shaping these events."<br />http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0ahUKEwi0h_bwqcjKAhWCej4KHaCNAnsQtwIIJTAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DiaZXojJsVlA&usg=AFQjCNHOTy2IpfqNo2QOYD2fQqlFSszLsA<br />http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=17&ved=0ahUKEwiQqq28qsjKAhUN12MKHRC4CCU4ChAWCCkwBg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2FStevenParrisWard%2Fa-half-truth-is-a-whole-lie-the-fallacies-of-jewish-supremacism-jewish-bolshevism-and-the-international-jewish-conspiracy&usg=AFQjCNGJexUBCCTAY8tgdqsYKrbYh-LBdQJacobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07099500455962505463noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-57048580065967578842015-09-30T02:30:29.011+03:002015-09-30T02:30:29.011+03:00PUTIN IS THE GREATEST LEADER IN THE WORLD!
THE CF...PUTIN IS THE GREATEST LEADER IN THE WORLD!<br /><br />THE CFR IS DEMONIC & WANTS TO DESTROY RUSSIA!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07312855419228806336noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-74617434478485394502015-08-31T02:57:09.925+03:002015-08-31T02:57:09.925+03:00TALMUD
PART 2
SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis ta...TALMUD <br />PART 2<br /><br />SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit...All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.<br /> <br /> <br />KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".<br /> (footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."<br /> <br />KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."<br /> (footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."<br /> <br />ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.<br /> <br />SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) - the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?"<br /><br />Of the "sacred" Talmudic teachings of the "Sages," preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates "fools" with "reprobate minds" than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: "When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go." Footnote: "Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place." Further footnote: "Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, there fore, be suspected."<br />The Jerusalem Post, May 19, 2000 (14 Iyar 5760)<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07986545387621597882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-40439933280627440552015-08-31T02:56:42.237+03:002015-08-31T02:56:42.237+03:00"THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORL..."THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD”!<br /><br />The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was "Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices" by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.', Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the "Foreword" for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.<br /><br /> The world's leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic "The History of the Talmud," Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:<br /><br /> "THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence...IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH..."<br /> <br /><br />SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: "What is meant by this? - Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? - Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5)."<br /> <br /> This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:<br /> <br /><br />SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)." <br /><br />(footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse." <br /> <br /> <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07986545387621597882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-69889019048455874212015-05-19T02:30:36.401+03:002015-05-19T02:30:36.401+03:00PLEASE GOOGLE:
THE JEWS ARE CALLED MEN
Tzfi'a...PLEASE GOOGLE:<br /><br />THE JEWS ARE CALLED MEN<br />Tzfi'a 3 <br />The Editorial Board <br />President of the Editorial Board and Founder: Rabbi Moshe Segal OBM <br />Rabbi Yisrael Ariel <br />Moshe Asher <br />Joel Rakovsky <br />Amishar Segal <br />Articles are the authors' responsibility <br />5749 <br />THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN JEWS AND GENTILES IN TORAH<br />Rabbi David Bar Chaim <br />Yeshivat Mercaz HaRav<br />Introduction <br />Over the past few years, there has been a recognizable trend amongst different circles in the religious community -- a humanistic/universal inclination. There are many who have written in praise of love, "for all men who were created in the image of G-d." We have even been "graced" with a pamphlet of this name, Chaviv Adam Sh'nivra B'tzelem, composed and edited by Mr. Yochanan Ben Ya'acov, the Director General of the Bnei Akiva Youth Movement. The explicit goal of those who share this outlook is to prove that all men are equal, that it is forbidden to discriminate against any man on the basis of his race, and that anyone who claims the opposite is nothing but a racist, distorting the words of the Torah in order to fit them to his "dreadful" opinions. <br />Here are two examples: <br /><br />1. A statement by Ms. R. Huberman: <br /><br />"...I never imagined that the Torah discriminates between one man and the next on the basis of faith, nationality, or race...on the contrary, it is our Torah which teaches that the blood of man is holy simply because he is man: 'Whoever sheds man's blood by man shall his blood be shed, for in the image of G-d made He man' (Genesis 9)...in the Ten Commandments it is written: 'You shall not murder'! There is no hint of a restriction, no hint that the prohibition applies to a Jew and not to a Gentile..." <br />("Between Blood and Blood," Amudim, a monthly magazine of the Religious Kibbutz Movement, Tamuz 5745, pg.352). <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-27333583109935172802015-05-19T02:28:52.747+03:002015-05-19T02:28:52.747+03:00GOYOPHOBIA
PART 2
A ban on returning a lost item ...GOYOPHOBIA<br />PART 2<br /><br />A ban on returning a lost item to a Gentile if the reason for returning it is one's sympathy towards the Gentile and compassion for him. <br /><br />The sum which a Gentile overpays in a business transaction due to his own error is forfeit; whether a Jew is permitted to intentionally deceive a Gentile is also discussed. <br />One who kidnaps a Jew is liable to death, but one who kidnaps a Gentile is exempt. <br />A Jew who hurts or injures a Gentile is not liable for compensation of damage, but a Gentile who hurts a Jew is liable to death. <br /><br />One who overcharges a Gentile ought not return him the sum that the Gentile overpaid. <br /><br />A Gentile -- or even a convert to Judaism -- may not be appointed king or public official of any sort (e. g. a cabinet minister). <br /><br />One who defames a female proselyte (claiming that she was not virgin at the time of her marriage) is liable to neither lashes nor fine. <br /><br />The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile. <br />One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment "love your neighbour" applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles. <br />One who sees Gentile graveyards should curse: "Your mother shall be greatly ashamed..." <br /><br />Gentiles are likened to animals. <br /><br />If an ox damaged a Gentile maidservant, it should be considered as though the ox damaged a she-ass. <br /><br />The dead body of a Gentile does not bear ritual impurity, nor does a Gentile who touches the dead body of a Jew become impure -- he is considered like an animal who touched a dead body. <br /><br />One is forbidden to pour anointing oil on a Jew, but there is no ban on pouring that oil on a Gentile because Gentiles are likened to animals. <br /><br />An animal slaughtered by a Gentile is forbidden, even if the ritual slaughter performed was technically correct, because Gentiles are deemed like animals. (Daat Emet does not agree that this is the Halachic reason for invalidating a Gentile's ritual slaughter -- but this is not the place to delve into the subject). <br /><br />Their members are like those of asses" -- Gentiles are likened to animals. <br /><br />Between the Jews and the Gentiles -- In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought<br /><br />R' Bar-Chayim's arguments and conclusions are clear, Halachically accurate, and supported by almost all the existent major Halachic works. It would be superfluous to say that R' Bar-Chayim fully embraces this racist Halachic outlook as the word of the Living G-d, as he himself pointed out in the "Conclusion" of his article: <br /><br />"It is clear to every Jew who accepts the Torah as G-d's word from Sinai, obligatory and valid for all generations, that it is impossible to introduce 'compromises' or 'renovations' into it."<br /><br />On the other hand, we want to make it clear that Daat Emet -- as well as any reasonable people who do not embrace Halachic laws as the word of the Living G-d -- are repulsed by such evil, racist discrimination.<br /><br />In the Hebrew text we have abridged the second part of R' Bar-Chayim's article, <br /><br />"Between Jews and Gentiles -- In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought," because, in our view, the Halacha is the law which obligates every religious Jew while concepts of the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and Jewish thought are not binding on anyone, as our rabbis have already written: <br /><br />"And so the Aggadic constructs of the disciples of disciples, such as Rav Tanchuma and Rabbi Oshaya and their like -- most are incorrect, and therefore we do not rely on the words of Aggadah" (Sefer HaEshkol, Laws of a Torah Scroll, p. 60a); we have expanded on this issue in the portion of Vayeshev.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-52918487603828809582015-05-19T02:27:44.502+03:002015-05-19T02:27:44.502+03:00GOYOPHOBIA:
THE HATRED OF GOYIM/GENTILES BY JEWS
...GOYOPHOBIA: <br />THE HATRED OF GOYIM/GENTILES BY JEWS<br />"If there was a legal case between a Jew and a Gentile (non-Jew), then the manner of judging between them is as I will explain: if we [i.e., a Jew] will win under their laws, we judge them according to their laws and say to them: this is your law! If it is better that we judge according to our laws, we judge them according to our laws and say to them: this is our law! And do not find it difficult, and don't be surprised by it, just as one is not surprised about the slaughter of animals even though they have done no harm, for one in whom human characteristics are not complete is not truly a man, and his end purpose is only for 'man' [that is to say, the entire raison d'etre of the Gentiles is only for the benefit of the complete man -- <br />comment by Rabbi Y. Kapach shlita in his edition of Maimonides's Commentary on the Mishnah], and the discussion on this matter requires a separate book." <br />GENTILES IN HALACHA<br /><br />Foreword -- Daat Emet<br /><br />For a long time we have been considering the necessity of informing our readers about Halacha's real attitude towards non-Jews. Many untrue things are publicized on this issue and the facts should be made clear. But recently, we were presented with a diligently written article on the subject, authored by a scholar from the Merkaz HaRav yeshiva -- so our job was done by others (though we have already discussed some aspects of this issue in the weekly portions of Balak and Matot). Since there is almost no disagreement between us and the author of the article on this issue, we have chosen to bring the article "Jews Are Called 'Men'" by R' David Bar-Chayim (in Hebrew) so that the reader will be able to study and understand the attitude of the Halacha towards non-Jews. <br /><br />In this article R' Bar-Chayim discusses the attitude towards "Gentiles" in the Torah and in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion: <br /><br />"The Torah of Israel makes a clear distinction between a Jew, who is defined as 'man,' and a Gentile." <br /><br />That is to say, any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha. R' Bar-Chayim's work is comprehensive, written with intellectual honesty, and deals with almost all the aspects of Halachic treatment of non-Jews. It also refutes the statements of those rabbis who speak out of wishful thinking and, influenced by concepts of modern society, claim that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. R' Bar-Chayim shows that all these people base their constructs NOT on the Torah but solely on the inclinations of their own hearts. He also shows that there are even rabbis who intentionally distort the Halachic attitude to Gentiles, misleading both themselves and the general public.<br /><br />For the English readers' convenience we will briefly mention the topics dealt with in R' Bar-Chayim's article:<br /><br />Laws in regard to murder, which clearly state that there is Halachic difference between murder of a Jew and of a Gentile (the latter is considered a far less severe crime). <br /><br />A ban on desecrating the Sabbath to save the life of a Gentile. <br /><br />A Jew's exemption from liability if his property (e. g. ox) causes damage to a Gentile's property. But if a Gentile's property causes damage to a Jew's property, the Gentile is liable. <br /><br />The question of whether robbery of a Gentile is forbidden by the Torah's law or only by a Rabbinic decree. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-51251271808037467722013-04-17T23:03:45.267+04:002013-04-17T23:03:45.267+04:00CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politicia...CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politician. In 1920, he wrote a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the "national Jews" of Russia, he said:<br /><br /> "In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.<br /><br /> There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders... In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. <br /><br />("Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5608996291355843279.post-32400310186535601092011-08-13T05:14:29.740+04:002011-08-13T05:14:29.740+04:00amazing!
замечательный
maravilhoso!amazing!<br />замечательный<br />maravilhoso!INOVAR - ESTUDOS DIRIGIDOShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18371961945435442391noreply@blogger.com