The Kursk tragedy took place eleven years ago today. The following 50 minute French produced documentary (see video link below the picture) was initially aired several years ago to record audiences in France. It is believed by some that the Russian navy's mighty Kursk was not lost as a result of an accidental explosion of one of its on-board torpedoes but rather as a result of a deliberate attack by a US submarine. Regardless of this documentary's accuracy, the content of the film is very interesting. If the allegation is true, however, the geopolitical implications of this tragic incident are great indeed. Nonetheless, it's easy to see the political reasons behind why officials in Washington would carry out such a risky operation. Washington wanted to show Vladimir Putin, the newly elected nationalist leader and an ambitious former KGB official, who was still in charge at the time. As far as Washington and its allies were concerned, Vladimir Putin's nationalistic aspirations were to be suppressed at all costs. Vladimir Putin may have decided to take the unexpected hit because he was simply in no position to respond in any way at the time. President Putin had an immense task ahead of him - to reverse the monumental damages the Russian Federation had suffered during the chaotic years following the Soviet Union's unexpected and sudden collapse in early 1990s. His decision to remain silent and continue paying lip service to Washington at the time paid off. Within a few short years after his ascension to power, Russia began to gradually get off of its knees and turn into a superpower once again.
Arevordi
August, 2011
Arevordi
August, 2011
***
US Accused to Have 'Torpedoed Kursk Nuclear Sub'
Kursk: a submarin in troubled waters (video documentary): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=985zeVQLnDc
A FORMER British military official has backed a sensational claim that the Russian nuclear submarine, the Kursk, was torpedoed by US forces in August 2000. An official inquest concluded that the disaster – in which all 118 crew drowned in the Barents Sea, 135km off the Russian coast – was caused by an accidental explosion of an onboard torpedo. But Maurice Stradling, a former torpedo engineer and a key figure in the original investigation, believes a new French documentary, The Kursk: A Submarine in Troubled Waters, should change world opinion on the sinking.
"On the balance of probabilities, the Kursk was sunk by an American MK-48 torpedo," said Mr Stradling, formerly a senior member of the British Defence Ministry.
BBC editor Nick Fraser called the claim a "pack of lies" and has refused to air the documentary, which attracted a record audience of more than 4 million when it screened on French TV. The BBC used Mr Stradling as its main authority for a documentary it made in 2001 – What Sank the Kursk?, in which Mr Stradling theorised that the sinking was caused by the malfunctioning of an old-fashioned HTP torpedo. Mr Stradling, who also appears in the new French documentary, said: "At the time (2001), that was a perfectly reasonable film, given the facts as we knew them then, when there seemed to be no third-party involvement,"
The new explanation for the Kursk's downing is based on film footage of a hole in the side of the vessel, and evidence placing US submarines in the area at the time it was sunk. The French film shows stills of the Kursk raised above the water after being salvaged, with a precise circular hole in its right side. The hole clearly bends inwards, consistent with an attack from outside the submarine. A US military source in the documentary declares the hole to be the trademark evidence of an American MK-48 torpedo, which is made to melt cleanly through steel sheet due to a mechanism at its tip that combusts copper. The film suggests the attack happened while two US submarines, the Toledo and Memphis, were shadowing the Kursk in a routine military exercise.
The documentary says the Toledo accidentally collided with the Kursk, at which point the Russian submarine opened its torpedo tubes, leading to an attack from the Memphis, which was protecting the damaged Toledo while it retreated. The cause of the sinking was covered up at the time in an act of diplomacy between then US presidents Bill Clinton and Russian President Vladimir Putin – a deal that included the cancellation of $US10 billion ($12.5 billion) of Russian debt, the film states. After the documentary received its only public broadcast in Britain, some claimed the Russian navy had drilled the hole and fed doctored footage to the film-makers to create a false impression.
"On the balance of probabilities, the Kursk was sunk by an American MK-48 torpedo," said Mr Stradling, formerly a senior member of the British Defence Ministry.
BBC editor Nick Fraser called the claim a "pack of lies" and has refused to air the documentary, which attracted a record audience of more than 4 million when it screened on French TV. The BBC used Mr Stradling as its main authority for a documentary it made in 2001 – What Sank the Kursk?, in which Mr Stradling theorised that the sinking was caused by the malfunctioning of an old-fashioned HTP torpedo. Mr Stradling, who also appears in the new French documentary, said: "At the time (2001), that was a perfectly reasonable film, given the facts as we knew them then, when there seemed to be no third-party involvement,"
The new explanation for the Kursk's downing is based on film footage of a hole in the side of the vessel, and evidence placing US submarines in the area at the time it was sunk. The French film shows stills of the Kursk raised above the water after being salvaged, with a precise circular hole in its right side. The hole clearly bends inwards, consistent with an attack from outside the submarine. A US military source in the documentary declares the hole to be the trademark evidence of an American MK-48 torpedo, which is made to melt cleanly through steel sheet due to a mechanism at its tip that combusts copper. The film suggests the attack happened while two US submarines, the Toledo and Memphis, were shadowing the Kursk in a routine military exercise.
The documentary says the Toledo accidentally collided with the Kursk, at which point the Russian submarine opened its torpedo tubes, leading to an attack from the Memphis, which was protecting the damaged Toledo while it retreated. The cause of the sinking was covered up at the time in an act of diplomacy between then US presidents Bill Clinton and Russian President Vladimir Putin – a deal that included the cancellation of $US10 billion ($12.5 billion) of Russian debt, the film states. After the documentary received its only public broadcast in Britain, some claimed the Russian navy had drilled the hole and fed doctored footage to the film-makers to create a false impression.
Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...i?ArtNum=94693
No! As a former torpedoman, mk48 technician, mk48's don't operate that way at all! What was described sounds like an armor piercing shape charged munition. Like a Panzerfaust, or RPG. Mk48's do not intercept by contact, they detonate UNDER the target's keel, creating a 'hole in the ocean', leveraging target's own weight against it, which ripples like waves in a pool, breaking the target's keel.
ReplyDelete